To: SirJohnBarleycorn
I agree, now is the time for the Defense guys to hush. The DA is not interested in facts and looks like he have his AV switch her story to match what he can find out.
Does anyone think he'd try this crap if these were black defendants ... anyone?
To: investigateworld
Depends on his voter base....I think his May primary will be more watched than a presidential election...
1,366 posted on
04/20/2006 11:19:30 PM PDT by
Neverforget01
(Proud enemy of the drive-by-media)
To: investigateworld
And offend the voters in Durham? No way.
To: investigateworld
They need a venue change. I'm telling you right now. Don't you remember all the white people that were shocked that the O.J. Jurors could ignore the mountain of evidence. They had NO IDEA how the black community was viewing the case.
If no venue change, this jury will come back will a guilty verdict in 30 minutes.
1,370 posted on
04/20/2006 11:24:16 PM PDT by
OakOak
( ...The issue is C R E D I B I L I T Y)
To: investigateworld; SirJohnBarleycorn; Locomotive Breath
If Nancy Grace, Crier, Susan Filan, Kimberly Guilfoyle, and Greta's panel can disregard the alibis and all the inconsistencies... You better believe a black jury will easily ignore all evidence pointing towards innocence.
That's what the DA KNOWS. His standard of proof is SO LOW after he gets his jury.
.
1,372 posted on
04/20/2006 11:27:30 PM PDT by
OakOak
( ...The issue is C R E D I B I L I T Y)
To: investigateworld
Does anyone think he'd try this crap if these were black defendants ... anyone?I'll check with Al Sharpton to see what he thinks.
;-)
1,413 posted on
04/21/2006 2:09:08 AM PDT by
beyond the sea
(Oh, for the days when "disrespect" was just a noun.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson