To: hispanarepublicana
I wish her luck with that endeavor, although at this point it hardly matters.
The headline should not have been altered unless the facts were embedded in the article.
I also notice that she never answered my question in post 175 where I asked her if she thought the term "wetback" was acceptable.
234 posted on
04/19/2006 11:29:44 AM PDT by
RMDupree
(HHD: Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
To: RMDupree
My original post #189 was not ever addressed either. Probably refreshing the bandages on the scrapes folks get on their knuckles when they drag them.
235 posted on
04/19/2006 11:31:38 AM PDT by
hispanarepublicana
(Hey, Washington, which laws do I get to break?)
To: RMDupree
also notice that she never answered my question in post 175 where I asked her if she thought the term "wetback" was acceptable. I never answered you because YOU never answered the question about calling the speech police.
265 posted on
04/19/2006 6:09:12 PM PDT by
Full Court
(And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson