Assuming the time lines are correct and the lack of DNA evidence is true, I cannot see how it could be.
The potential holes is the timeline is not correct or the girl is confused about the timing. She was intoxicated and that would not be a stretch. I would be concerned that there was no preexisting contact and that the photo time stamps are confirm-able.
Here is my take on what actually happened: I suspect the boys hired a stripper who agreed to do a few tricks for 800 dollars (the figure I heard)....they being drunk, as well as at the age every time they blink their eyes get an erection....were highly upset that she showed up drunk....unable to perform..called her a few names because they knew that suing for "specific performance" probably wouldn't do much good. Someone get's to her and suggests she holler rape and the episode is on!! Let's face it women who work in titty bars and make personal appearances are not helpless damsels in distress. Further, as drunk as she apparently was....for sure all those white boys would look the same!! The DA is a lowlife trying to string this thing out past the election in a couple of weeks playing the race card together with the white rich boy trick.
I wish I knew the exact dimensions of that bathroom; it has been described as "small" and even "tiny," so I have wondered about how realistic it is that a rape would even have been attempted in there, much less actually carried out. You'd think they would have carried her into a bedroom, where there would actually be room to perpetrate the crime.
Yes, a good maxim to always keep in mind in analyzing these types of cases.
In this case, the following maxim would also apply: sua fabula non gradus anus rodentum
(Her story ain't worth a rat's a**)