[Frank_Discussion]

"More intelligent than most reported studies by ufology 'physicists'."

I'm trying to to see how that is a true statement. It depends what you are talking about in the Ufology milieu. Few physicists look at the propulsion power source and methods themselves, though the pop-culture types often speculate without any basis in science.

There have been a few disciplined people who have looked at the issue with rigor, though. Paul Hill comes to mind as the chief example.

[Frank_Discussion]

Let me clarify: The "pop-culture type" would be those without real scientific background, but able to string together a cat's cradle of science jargon, regardless of true scientific connectivity. Bob Lazar, and others.

[Quix]

I don't recall if Stan Friedman did, or not. Do you recall?