Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Yo-Yo

This really doesn't make much sense. The A380 is twice the seating capacity of the A340 and will only be able to land at major hub airports.
How is that a suitable replacement from a business perspective?



10 posted on 04/14/2006 10:00:55 PM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Proud_USA_Republican; Yo-Yo; phantomworker
This really doesn't make much sense. The A380 is twice the seating capacity of the A340 and will only be able to land at major hub airports. How is that a suitable replacement from a business perspective?

Emirates is already the largest purchaser of A380's, what's another dozen or two A380's to them? Emirates will buy Boeing 777-300ER's instead of A340-600's and replace its A340-500's with 777-200LR's.

Airbus should have replaced the A330 and A340 lines with a clean sheet A350 design. Instead, they are wasting huge sums of money on a reworked obsolete 35 year old fuselage cross-section. The 787 will seat 9 abreast comfortably using seats the same size as those used on a 747-400. The A350 will be very uncomfortable for any tall man sitting in a window seat in a 9-abreast configuration due to the curvature of the fuselage. Airlines specifying 8-abreast seating will have more room for each passenger than on the A300/A330/A340/A350 fuselage cross-section.

11 posted on 04/14/2006 10:20:36 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson