To: CarolinaGuitarman
This gene didn't *poof* out of thin air. It had to have been designed. That's not quite how it works. Spontaneous mutations occur. When I took genetics the thought was that any gene would mutate into something different about one in a miilion times.
105 posted on
04/02/2006 8:45:18 AM PDT by
curmudgeonII
(One man...and the Lord...are a majority.)
To: curmudgeonII; CarolinaGuitarman
When I took genetics the thought was that any gene would mutate into something different about one in a miilion times.But there must be an evidence trail inasmuch as the new gene mutates from an existing gene. The article claims that there is no precursor.
106 posted on
04/02/2006 9:03:30 AM PDT by
Condorman
(Prefer infinitely the company of those seeking the truth to those who believe they have found it.)
To: curmudgeonII
What has to be understood is that the BS 4u gene that was discovered is homozygotically discontinuous with all known tertiary insertions points of this avian family. Again, it couldn't have *poofed* into existence; it must have been designed. The release date of this paper is an exciting day in biological history. It will make all previous assumptions appear foolish.
107 posted on
04/02/2006 9:04:17 AM PDT by
CarolinaGuitarman
("Things are not what they always seem.")
To: curmudgeonII
Can you demonstrate where new genes come from? I don't believe there is any scientific evidence that a mutation has ever produced a new species or even a new organ or system in an existing species. Protozoa do not have teeth. Where did the genes come from that produced teeth if we have evolved from protozoa? Mutations concern changes in existing organisms, they do not produce new ones.
125 posted on
04/03/2006 1:45:40 PM PDT by
caffe
(W)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson