If you mean do have cartoons also, no, I liked yours though, they were very nice, thank you.
You just don't seem to have much to say.
Originally, you were trying to argue that evolution can't provide any explanation for the origin of the eye. So I provided a perfectly plausible mechanism.
Do we know how eyes evolved? No, we don't. But I provided a plausible pedigree, one that uses evolutionary mechanisms to lead to modern eyes.
Now you seem to be arguing that my pedigree is conjecture. Of course it is! But you're not saying we don't know how eyes evolved, you're saying there's no way evolution can lead to the evolution of eyes which is clearly, and patently false.
So stop with your pithy comments and start being honest. With me, with yourself and with the rest of the posters on this forum.