Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Alter Kaker

Ah yes! The light sensitive patch of skin! And the light sensitive patch was what before it was a light sensitive patch of skin? No need for eye sockets before you have eyes, especially before you have light sensitive patches.

Then we move any to the very intricate human cell that could not function if any of it's too numerous components were absent, waiting for the mutating opportunity.

have an open mind, afterall, we are not liberals.

Evolutionists should give it up, no need to for Truth.


24 posted on 09/22/2006 2:25:16 AM PDT by HankReardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: HankReardon
The light sensitive patch of skin!

Yes, which a number of organisms currently possess.

And the light sensitive patch was what before it was a light sensitive patch of skin?

A non-light sensitive patch of skin. The thing is, a single mutation can trigger light sensitivity.

No need for eye sockets before you have eyes

Correct. Light-sensing apparati evolved before eye sockets.

Then we move any to the very intricate human cell that could not function if any of it's too numerous components were absent, waiting for the mutating opportunity.

You're still not understanding the basic mechanism of evolution. Eye evolution is pretty straightforward, once you understand that nobody's suggesting that the eye evolved instantaneously. I presented a perfectly plausible incremental framework and you're still pretending that us silly evil-utionists think that -- zap -- the eye evolved overnight. Keep your strawmen to yourself.

25 posted on 09/22/2006 8:39:27 AM PDT by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson