To: Borges
4. In Search of Lost Time - Proust
Wretched, miserable, execrable, abysmal book. To be fair I only read Swann's Way and Within a Budding Grove, but it was by far the dumbest thing I have ever read. Pretentious, plodding, pointless. How many pages can you read about a church steeple? To get through this book, you'll have to conquer 12. In a row. How little can happen in the 1000 pages of the 2 volumes (of 7 total) that I read? How about having tea with Madame Swann, and then going to the beach. That's it. Maybe there's something I'm not getting. Maybe I'll try it again some day. Much of the prose is beautiful, but the plot is so uncompelling that it hardly matters.
14 posted on
02/17/2006 9:17:19 AM PST by
Cyclopean Squid
(History is a work in progress)
To: Cyclopean Squid
It's been called the literary equivalent of Einstein's physics.
17 posted on
02/17/2006 9:18:21 AM PST by
Borges
To: Cyclopean Squid
I agree with your assessment. Proust was rather narcissistic
51 posted on
02/17/2006 9:56:09 AM PST by
Knitting A Conundrum
(Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
To: Cyclopean Squid
Proust is required reading anyway since the book is referenced by so many. To see what is going on might be near impossible without reading the whole thing six pages a day for a few years to the end because the secret is at the end but won't mean anything without the rest. It certainly helps to read some of Proust's sources.
198 posted on
02/18/2006 4:26:00 PM PST by
RightWhale
(pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson