Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2006 TO BE A MAKE OR BREAK YEAR FOR HOLLYWOOD
Ad Age.com ^ | 1/24/06 | T.L. Stanley

Posted on 01/24/2006 12:38:35 PM PST by Millee

This is a make-or-break year for Hollywood.

“One down year is an anomaly, but two could be a trend,” said Paul Dergarabedian, president of box office-tracking firm Exhibitor Relations Co. “This year is really a turning point.”

Keenly aware of the 7% drop in movie attendance in 2005, studio executives are pinning their hopes on a better slate of films to draw consumers back to the multiplex. But industry watchers say the business has more far-reaching problems that a few good films can’t necessarily fix as in-control consumers turn to entertainment alternatives like Netflix, the Internet and on-demand programming.

Box office down With box office down and costs up -- the average Hollywood film now costs about $65 million to produce and another $35 million for prints and advertising—this could well be a watershed year as executives are forced to rethink some of the traditional tenets of the business. Among them: cinemas getting first crack at releases; top acting talent getting sweetheart deals; and rethinking the hallowed concept of tent-pole movies.

Moreover, pundits predict that studio marketing dollars will continue to migrate away from TV and toward the Internet, grassroots events and guerrilla marketing.

(Excerpt) Read more at adage.com ...


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: 2006; boxoffice; hollywood
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 last
To: Maximus of Texas
You're not princess I thought you were

LOL

Sorry I love scary movies....always have.

But I agree with you that the box covers for these movies can be to much for kids. I don't want my boys to see them either.

Can we still be friends?
101 posted on 01/24/2006 3:36:46 PM PST by PaulaB (How about never? Is never good for you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: baker_girl
PUSH THE GAS,LOCK THE DOOR!

LOL ....kindred spirits
102 posted on 01/24/2006 3:38:08 PM PST by PaulaB (How about never? Is never good for you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: baker_girl

Did you ever see "Jeepers Creepers"?

I was screaming

RUN OVER HIM AGAIN

RUN OVER HIM AGAIN ;P


103 posted on 01/24/2006 3:40:36 PM PST by PaulaB (How about never? Is never good for you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: PaulaB

LOL!

Are you sure were not related?


104 posted on 01/24/2006 3:46:57 PM PST by baker_girl (Learn the rules so you know how to break them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: baker_girl

We are now long lost FR-sisters ;P


105 posted on 01/24/2006 3:48:33 PM PST by PaulaB (How about never? Is never good for you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: PaulaB

Did you watch House of Wax?


106 posted on 01/24/2006 3:52:45 PM PST by baker_girl (Learn the rules so you know how to break them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: PaulaB

Let me sleep on it.


107 posted on 01/24/2006 4:12:31 PM PST by Maximus of Texas (On my signal, unleash hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Millee

It's really simple. The technology has improved to the point where people don't see the added value over watching the movie in their home. Find a way to sell the movie at a theatre price to people in their homes.

In my case, it is too much trouble to try and locate a babysitter so I can go to a theatre. It's much easier just to wait until it comes out on DVD. That said, I would gladly pay $20 for my wife and I to be able to legally watch a first-run movie at home.


108 posted on 01/24/2006 4:29:24 PM PST by Scutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: baker_girl
Not yet...is it good?

it's in my Netflix Queue
109 posted on 01/24/2006 4:29:38 PM PST by PaulaB (How about never? Is never good for you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Millee

I was reading Entertainment Weekly's 2006 preview issue yesterday, and for the first time perhaps ever, there's not a single new movie, television show or cd that I'm excited about. The Da Vinci Code with a woefully miscast Tom Hanks? Yawn. Mission Impossible III with the couch-jumping Scientologist? Hahaha, right. Oliver Stone's take on 9/11? Not if you friggin' paid me. Plus, it's an election year, so celebrities will be unable to keep themselves from injecting their opinions on foreign policy, hysterically, whenever they can. I see the box office definitely going further downhill.


110 posted on 01/24/2006 4:32:20 PM PST by Jessica24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

That was funny.


111 posted on 01/24/2006 7:48:57 PM PST by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson