Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Emmalein
"Personally, I didn't see any thing wrong with what Mizrahi did. Sure he pushed the boundaries but those shows can be awfully boring and stuffy."

Hmmm except the part where he touched women inappropriately and non-consensually - they almost hung Arnold out there for that.
4 posted on 01/21/2006 6:48:40 PM PST by gondramB (Democracy: two wolves and a lamb voting on lunch. Liberty: a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: gondramB
I'm going out on a limb here...as a woman, I think that there is a BIG difference between a sexually based "touch" and one that's not. I understand that we all have physical boundaries that we don't like crossed and for most people what he did would not have been acceptable. However, it IS different when the touch is sexual in meaning and when it's not. It's like when Trinny & Susannah (not sure of the spelling) of the British version of What Not To Wear grab at the woman's breasts to show them that they aren't wearing the right bra. Mizrahi, as gay as he is, is like a female friend, so the gesture is interpreted in a friendlier, less threatening way, IMHO.
5 posted on 01/21/2006 7:00:49 PM PST by Emmalein (To each his/her own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson