Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Irish_Thatcherite; Monkey Face
I think most creationists do acknowledge the Big Bang theory.

Not only acknowledge but accept. The Big Bang allows for a definite beginning of the universe. Prior to the discoveries made from, say, 1920 to 1965, static state theory held ground--it had to since implying a beginning implies that something began, and this would cede ground to theistic cosmology.

You see a good deal of such philosophical gymnastics today, too. Scientists, and the public, are painfully allergic to negative evidence at times.
4,369 posted on 02/18/2006 4:28:19 PM PST by Das Outsider (The chief end of man is not civil freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4356 | View Replies ]


To: Das Outsider

The static state theory was nuts!!


4,371 posted on 02/18/2006 4:33:24 PM PST by Irish_Thatcherite (~~~A vote for Bertie Ahern is a vote for Gerry Adams!~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4369 | View Replies ]

To: Das Outsider
Scientists, and the public, are painfully allergic to negative evidence at times.

Which negative evidence?

4,372 posted on 02/18/2006 4:34:15 PM PST by fanfan (I'd still rather hunt with Cheney, than drive with Kennedy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4369 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson