To: Irish_Thatcherite; Monkey Face
I think most creationists do acknowledge the Big Bang theory.
Not only acknowledge but accept. The Big Bang allows for a definite beginning of the universe. Prior to the discoveries made from, say, 1920 to 1965, static state theory held ground--it had to since implying a beginning implies that something began, and this would cede ground to theistic cosmology.
You see a good deal of such philosophical gymnastics today, too. Scientists, and the public, are painfully allergic to negative evidence at times.
4,369 posted on
02/18/2006 4:28:19 PM PST by
Das Outsider
(The chief end of man is not civil freedom.)
To: Das Outsider
The static state theory was nuts!!
4,371 posted on
02/18/2006 4:33:24 PM PST by
Irish_Thatcherite
(~~~A vote for Bertie Ahern is a vote for Gerry Adams!~~~)
To: Das Outsider
Scientists, and the public, are painfully allergic to negative evidence at times.Which negative evidence?
4,372 posted on
02/18/2006 4:34:15 PM PST by
fanfan
(I'd still rather hunt with Cheney, than drive with Kennedy.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson