Posted on 01/05/2006 2:29:38 PM PST by ShadowAce
Coldplay's new CD has rules: No MP3s, no DVD players, no car stereos
Coldplay's new CD comes with an insert that discloses all the rules enforced by the DRM they included on the disc. Of course, these rules are only visible after you've paid for the CD and brought it home, and as the disc's rules say, "Except for manufacturing problems, we do not accept product exchange, return or refund," so if you don't like the rules, that's tough.
(via Digg)
Aside from my wise guy remark I agree with all you say. I don't like the RIAA and I don't like DRM. I won't be using Windows Vista if it means more DRM crap
Yeah, but...
The album is for sale at iTunes... $11.99 (or by song at $.99 per) for 13 songs, plus a video interview.
I fail to see what would stop me from, if I had the SLIGHTEST desire to listen to Coldplay, downloading the songs and burning a disk, which I could then rip into MP3's.
I'm afraid I just don't get it. Maybe, as someone else on the thread suggested, this is all a bad joke?
If Coldplay is gonna say "F_ck you!" to their fans, they'd better be rich enough to retire. If they are, more power to 'em; if they're not, f_ck 'em.
or go to www.allofmp3.com and buy it for $2.
(grin) got to love those russian copy right laws.
So who is Coldplay?
I just discovered AllofMP3......I haven't left my computer in like two weeks!!
I despise Coldplay, but I may go download this just as my own personal little "f--- you" to them and Virgin Records.
It's a big deal now because now they have the capability to stop you, or at least try to. When personal CD recording first became technologically and financially feasible, the record companies spent several years making the claim that "What we're worried about is perfect digital copies, not those lesser-quality dupes you get a home tape deck." Then, of course, MP3 trading started to take off, almost 100% of which (at the time) was of relatively mediocre-quality files; back then most people were still using dialup, so the extra quality of a 320k MP3 weren't considered worth the time it took to upload and download. What happened? The RIAA went after them too at the first opportunity.
Lying and generally-sleazy business practices are practically required genetic traits in the record business; it's the big reason why so few people have any moral qualms about file trading. As evidence, look to the movie industry by comparison: When a movie studio puts out a DVD, they go out of their way to make it worth buying: Far better video quality than you'll get on TV (non-HDTV anyway), tons of deleted scenes and bonus features, etc., all in a package that usually costs less than a single CD. All you get with a CD is (with a few exceptions here and there) liner notes, and often not even that. And then they try to soak you for as much as $19 for the "privilege". And of that $19 (for a CD and packaging that costs about 50 cents to produce), the artist may see 75 cents to a dollar of that, if they're lucky (and they usually aren't; most non-superstar artists end up making practically nothing, and sometimes even end up owing the record company money). All the artist's cash comes from concerts.
Now keep in mind that most record companies and movie studios are owned by the same few media conglomerates. Sony Studios gives you great, inexpensive DVDS, while Sony Records tries to screw you to the wall. Q.E.D.
Pretentious, self-important asses like Coldplay don't have any kind of sense of humor that would let them even consider creating a gag like this. Like all liberals with an overinflated sense of importance, their humor is limited to such "sophisticated" fare as fart jokes, grabbing their crotches and bashing all things Christian, conservative and American.
You're quite correct, there's nothing stopping you, besides taste. And I've already seen perfect, bit-for-bit copies of the CD (much better quality than what you get from iTunes) floating around the usual file trading sites, where the price is $0.00.
Hell, for nineteen bucks, you're lucky if there's more than two tracks on that CD that are even worth listening to.
Seems to me that if the copy protection software makes the cd "uncopiable" there should be no reason one can't return them anymore.
I'd try it and then sue in small claims just to make a point.
There are plenty of BETTER CDs that you can play on all of those devices. Wonder if their name should eb Pay=For-Play. Sony and WB were caught in payola scandals (yet again).
There is a reason music is as lame as it is today and it isn't because of a lack of talent.
It's hard to read the list of rules on an MP3 downloaded from a file-sharing service.
I can soon see ONE MORE thing added to that "agreement" for their software. That purcahse of this music CD software license does not constitute ownership and does not include any resale priviledges.
Moreso than "hometaping" killing the industry, USED CD sales impact the charts. Garth Brooks or Clint Black tried to keep his CDs out of any store that sold used product.
Only a matter of time. What do you think that "video" on a CD is? Or that "script" pdf on a DVD-ROM?
Doesn't matter if the added content is anything you WANT, all they need is to start calling it software instead of an album.
Real musicians still release their new albums on vinyl. Don't know if Coldplay merits wax these days. But if you can find it on LP, then it can be ported (legally) to other formats.
I doubt it is illegal, but it is against almost all store policies.
I am aware of NO store that allows you to return opened software, games, DVDs, or CDs.
Why? You could copy the DVD or CD in just a few minutes using programs like Nero and then return the product back to the store.
Ironically, I don't think there is such a policy on VHS tapes, and they can be copied just as easily as DVDs. Equipment to convert them to digital isn't as expensive as it used to be either.
ditto.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.