[nicmarlo]

What I actually stated: Your opinions are that the HUNDREDS of names/links to various scientists' dissenting opinions and studies, posted on FR on what must be thousands of posts and on a multitude of threads, which put forth dissenting theories/opinions/arguments/conclusions than the ones your and those in your "ping list/group" (i.e., FR evolutionarians) hold, are NOT CREDIBLE.

This does NOT state, nor even infer, that I was targeting/naming creationist, or pseudo-science.

[highball]

If you're not counting "creationist, or pseudo-science", then I'd love to see the "HUNDREDS of names/links to various scientists' dissenting opinions and studies, posted on FR on what must be thousands of posts and on a multitude of threads, which put forth dissenting theories/opinions/arguments/conclusions" that you reference.

Where are they, all these dissenting opinions on these boards that don't rely on either of these?