To: nicmarlo
" That is entirely different than what you claim I said, isn't it? "
No.
"I believe, as far as what is published, that not everything IS published that is credible, if it doesn't go along with a particular agenda with the editors/board of the journals that print evolution studies (i.e., one way evolution ideas). But, there is not a 100% consensus on evolution, is there?"
This isn't what you said, You said that anti-evolutionists where not allowed to publish. Are you backing down from this statement?
"The defintion of evolution has evolved: I was taught evolution was a theory. Of recent history, it has become to be defined as a fact."
It's a fact that evolution happens; there is a theory as to how evolution works.
"I already submitted a term paper to you regarding my "slash" mark and use of the word "or" within the same paragraph, but you claim I'm a liar and you know my intent better than I....that what I wrote I really didn't mean, never mind the fact that my college degree is in English and I graduated Summa Cum Laude."
If I were you would I would request my money back, as you don't understand the words you use.
340 posted on
11/21/2005 7:41:29 PM PST by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
To: CarolinaGuitarman
You said that anti-evolutionists where not allowed to publish. Are you backing down from this statement? Where did I say that?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson