Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry

Great. Thank you. That makes a lot of sense.


29 posted on 11/20/2005 10:25:00 AM PST by phantomworker (A new day! Begin it serenely; with too high a spirit to be encumbered with your old nonsense!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: phantomworker
In discussing whether the races of man were distinct species (and concluding -- contrary to the opinion of most of his contempories -- that they were not), Darwin himself expressed confusion over the term "species":
But it is a hopeless endeavour to decide this point, until some definition of the term "species" is generally accepted; and the definition must not include an indeterminate element such as an act of creation. We might as well attempt without any definition to decide whether a certain number of houses should be called a village, town, or city. We have a practical illustration of the difficulty in the never-ending doubts whether many closely-allied mammals, birds, insects, and plants, which represent each other respectively in North America and Europe, should be ranked as species or geographical races; and the like holds true of the productions of many islands situated at some little distance from the nearest continent.
Descent of Man, Chapter 7.
33 posted on 11/20/2005 10:38:26 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Expect no response if you're a troll, lunatic, retard, or incurable ignoramus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson