To: sinkspur
"Equal civil rights for homosexuals" is vague. Those who use that language often intend it to be code for terming state-sanctioned marriage as discriminatory. Where does she stand on that, and why would any competent President take a chance on someone who didn't stand in support of marriage?
61 posted on
10/13/2005 10:51:52 PM PDT by
Iconoclast2
(Two wings of the same bird of prey . . .)
To: Iconoclast2
Those who use that language often intend it to be code for terming state-sanctioned marriage as discriminatory. Where does she stand on that, and why would any competent President take a chance on someone who didn't stand in support of marriage? She opposed the lifting of the Texas sodomy statute. It's unlikely, given that she thinks the state has the right to regulate what two people do in the privacy of a bedroom (which I oppose, BTW), that she would approve of gay marriage.
68 posted on
10/13/2005 11:02:24 PM PDT by
sinkspur
(If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson