Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur

"Equal civil rights for homosexuals" is vague. Those who use that language often intend it to be code for terming state-sanctioned marriage as discriminatory. Where does she stand on that, and why would any competent President take a chance on someone who didn't stand in support of marriage?


61 posted on 10/13/2005 10:51:52 PM PDT by Iconoclast2 (Two wings of the same bird of prey . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Iconoclast2
Those who use that language often intend it to be code for terming state-sanctioned marriage as discriminatory. Where does she stand on that, and why would any competent President take a chance on someone who didn't stand in support of marriage?

She opposed the lifting of the Texas sodomy statute. It's unlikely, given that she thinks the state has the right to regulate what two people do in the privacy of a bedroom (which I oppose, BTW), that she would approve of gay marriage.

68 posted on 10/13/2005 11:02:24 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson