Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mike10542

Sorry but I tend to like her more and more as the day progresses.

Honestly, I was disapointed at first and would still have preferred the fight of a Brown or Luttig but RINOs made that impossible. The NE RINOs came out publically and said they would not support a proven pro-life conservative. A block of RINO's together with a unite Democrat party would be impossible to win.

What's the President to do? The only way it seems to get a pro-life conservative on the Bench is to nominate a stealth candidate. I trust the President knows her and knows what kind of Justice she will be. Bush 41 was screwed over by Sununu who vouched for Souters conservative credentials. Bush 43 personally knows Miers.

Besides being Pro-life she is for an individuals right to bear arms.


9 posted on 10/03/2005 5:22:35 PM PDT by Republican Red (''Van der Sloot" is Dutch for ''Kennedy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Republican Red

I agree. I doubt if Dubya would have nominated her if he didn't like where she was at. She's tried to fight for life with the bar association, even if she didn't win, she belongs to a conservative Christian church which is strongly pro-life, and from all accounts is a good person, and has worked with Bush a lot.

A lot of people today have been acting like lovers who found out their significant other betrayed them.

Talk about overreacting.

There are reasons, good reasons, why he picked this person to nominate. I trust his judgment about her character, and the more we listen, the more we will learn.


23 posted on 10/03/2005 5:32:44 PM PDT by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Republican Red
Cronyism + unqualified + 60 years old + unknown judicial philosophy = BAD PICK!!!!!

While I agree somewhat with this equation, in the end I do belove that GW consults with our Lord each day and has been guided in his decision. Romans 13 would be a good chapter to review for all of us.
31 posted on 10/03/2005 5:45:30 PM PDT by Who is Truth?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Republican Red

Cronyism + unqualified + 60 years old + unknown judicial philosophy = BAD PICK!!!!!

While I agree somewhat with this equation, in the end I do belove that GW consults with our Lord each day and has been guided in his decision. Romans 13 would be a good chapter to review for all of us.


35 posted on 10/03/2005 5:48:28 PM PDT by Who is Truth?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson