Skip to comments.
Pot icon Tommy Chong makes movie of his imprisonment
reuters.com ^
| 9 10 05
| Cameron French
Posted on 09/12/2005 4:36:47 PM PDT by freepatriot32
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 361-376 next last
To: A CA Guy
"Know your rights" is throwing every liberal debating trick in the book at you.
Stay cool.
81
posted on
09/12/2005 5:55:59 PM PDT
by
Michael Goldsberry
(an enemy of islam -- Joe Boucher; Leapfrog; Dr.Zoidberg; Lazamataz; ...)
To: Leapfrog
Their funny, I sometimes go over to DU to see what they posted about their beloved illegal drugs.
82
posted on
09/12/2005 5:58:29 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: A CA Guy
"Jack Daniels can kill you because it can cause you to go into an irreversible coma. The joint can't." That's the argument.
These people are insane.
83
posted on
09/12/2005 5:58:41 PM PDT
by
Michael Goldsberry
(an enemy of islam -- Joe Boucher; Leapfrog; Dr.Zoidberg; Lazamataz; ...)
To: A CA Guy
All druggieswarriors
are a waste of air, not just Chong. Fixed that for you, you're welcome.
And I notice you didn't give the basis for your assertion that:"Chong would probably died already without law enforcement intervention. " In other words, you do follow the standard drug warrior tactic of "argument by making crap up." And you didn't respond to the question of exactly what Tommy Chong did that he should have gone to Federal prison for.
And, if you pretend to be a conservative, do you believe that the Federal government should be limited in its authority and powers to those enumerated in the Constitution?
If so, please point out the article giving the Federal government the power to fight a "War on Drugs," and arrest people for possessing and selling drugs and "paraphernalia?" If the government has no such Constitutionally authorized power, doesn't that make the DEA and other "drug warriors" equivalent to any other criminal gang, and shouldn't they be the ones arrested and imprisoned?
84
posted on
09/12/2005 5:58:53 PM PDT
by
MRMEAN
(Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of congress;but I repeat myself. Mark Twain)
To: A CA Guy
when some are too uncouth to live in a society with some level of dignity and common senseWhy is uncouthness in a privately-owned establishment any business of yours, or of the people or their representatives?
85
posted on
09/12/2005 5:59:44 PM PDT
by
Know your rights
(The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
To: Leapfrog
Know your rights" is throwing every liberal debating trick in the book at you. This, after you try to pass off "not at liberty to break the law"? That's that kind of crap I expect Jim Carville or Bill Clinton to try and pass off as an argument. Jeez, get a clue.
86
posted on
09/12/2005 6:00:12 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: freepatriot32
Can you add me to your list?
Thanks
mcar
87
posted on
09/12/2005 6:00:37 PM PDT
by
mcar
To: A CA Guy
Quit squirming and address the point: People can't avoid going to restaurants?
88
posted on
09/12/2005 6:00:59 PM PDT
by
Know your rights
(The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
To: Leapfrog
They are pro druggie politicos and as you said, could be insane or worse. I don't know, but no conservative looks to drug themselves recreationally.
89
posted on
09/12/2005 6:02:41 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: A CA Guy
You say alcohol is bad? As bad as many of the drugs you want to be illegal ... so why won't you explain why you don't want that drug to be illegal, instead of you squirming, dodging, and evading in classic Bill Clinton style?
90
posted on
09/12/2005 6:03:07 PM PDT
by
Know your rights
(The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
To: Know your rights
Issue = Business where the public has access.
What you do in your home is more your own business, but if you drink lots while caring for the child or expose them to smoke, you might get problems as well.
91
posted on
09/12/2005 6:04:39 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Know your rights
Thinking that one must have unfettered access to mind-numbing drugs to be "free" is stupid. Drugs don't make you free. That's 1960s hippie bullcrap.
92
posted on
09/12/2005 6:05:03 PM PDT
by
Prime Choice
(E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
To: Leapfrog
Jack Daniels can kill you because it can cause you to go into an irreversible coma. The joint can't.These people are insane.
Which part of that statement do you claim is incorrect?
93
posted on
09/12/2005 6:05:11 PM PDT
by
Know your rights
(The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
To: Know your rights
A certain level of civility is maintained by law to maintain something called a civilization.
94
posted on
09/12/2005 6:06:11 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: A CA Guy
no conservative looks to drug themselves recreationally.No conservative drinks alcohol?
95
posted on
09/12/2005 6:06:47 PM PDT
by
Know your rights
(The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
To: tacticalogic
Okay, I'll buy a clue.
When are you "at liberty to break the law" as opposed to "not at liberty to break the law?"
96
posted on
09/12/2005 6:07:13 PM PDT
by
Michael Goldsberry
(an enemy of islam -- Joe Boucher; Leapfrog; Dr.Zoidberg; Lazamataz; ...)
To: Know your rights
The businesses are accessing the public in openly public areas, if they were instead having a party in their house, they could of course have a smoking party.
You may have a smoking party of your own as long as it isn't illegal stuff you are smoking.
97
posted on
09/12/2005 6:08:23 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: A CA Guy
Business where the public has access. Why does giving the public conditional access to your property lessen your right to say what's allowed or not allowed on that property? Sounds like socialism to me.
98
posted on
09/12/2005 6:08:58 PM PDT
by
Know your rights
(The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
To: Know your rights
If they drink in excess? That can be a problem, yes and I would say if done regularly they do have a major problem.
99
posted on
09/12/2005 6:09:34 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Know your rights
They are operating in the public arena and this is beyond the issue of living a private life.
The public has the right to a certain level of civility in their civilization.
100
posted on
09/12/2005 6:10:57 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 361-376 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson