And your point is....?
The existence of an argument on the Internet does not indicate its validity. T.O is especially bad at making arguments that are not only faulty, but totally irrelevant.
A few people are working on a complete response, and their work-in-progress is here:
http://www.nwcreation.net/wiki/index.php?title=Creationist_claims
However, for the most part, you can easily just read the T.O reasonings and look for the logical fallacies or the blatant misrepresentations.
Most of the links don't go anywhere. I realize that it could take some time to respond in detail, but even the links that have responses only list snippets of the original article.
An honest approach would link to the original article, then present a response.