Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest


Un resolutions not worth the paper? Yeah...I would tend to agree with that.

It's why we (U.S.) acted with a coalition of nations willing to fight along side of us...and not with the full sanction of the U.N. eventhough, the UN resolutions allowed for "dire" consequences.

The dumbocrats think we have acted unilaterally, at least that's what Kerry barked pre-election...he has a funny definition of "unilateral". We have good allies, and good ones are all we need.

Sadly, U.N. officals only understand "dire"...in terms of their own corruption. Darfur, child sexual assualt, oil for food...comes to mind.


104 posted on 06/27/2005 2:59:38 PM PDT by in hoc signo vinces ("Soylent green is people!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: in hoc signo vinces
Un resolutions not worth the paper? Yeah...I would tend to agree with that. It's why we (U.S.) acted with a coalition of nations willing to fight along side of us...and not with the full sanction of the U.N. eventhough, the UN resolutions allowed for "dire" consequences.

Which goes to show that our actions did not reflect a disparaging attitude towards UN resolutions. The position of the Administration all along has been that we've been acting in compliance with them, and in enforcement of them. That to me is the most unfortunate aspect of all this. It ends up strengthening the UN. Liberals now have the ability to say, "You enforced that resolution, now how about enforcing this one. And this, and this..."

111 posted on 06/27/2005 3:05:40 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson