You assume to know what I do not want to hear quite incorrectly. Your claim to being clairvoyant is quite typical of those who promote hocus pocus science and morality. A civil society will by law protect your right to promote yourself that way, as your claims are not falsifiable. What is amazing however, is that you are not appreciative of the higher morality which protects your right to practice hocus pocus. Instead you seek to impose your hocus pocus on others by using the law to make illegal that very morality which protects you. I find that absolutely incredible.
What I do know is that she does NOT think much of herself or other women.
I of course don't claim to know what she thinks as I don't claim to be a mind reader. I'm almost sure if we were to ask her, she would say she disagrees with you. But I doubt she could even come close to proving you wrong, as your claims are not falsifiable. Thus, the higher morality, protects your right to tell the world what she thinks even over her objections. Morality is not always fair, nor reasonable, and shouldn't be.
I doubt that she is a very happy camper. She reduced herself indirectly to s smutty lust object.
Now this is an opinion (not a claim to special powers and abilities) that we can disagree on. I didn't see any evidence of her not being a happy camper. I do however say that very rational people might see her as reducing herself indirectly into smutty lust object. But others might see her as celebrating and sharing with her son a wonderful beauty where others are only able to see ugliness. If were so inclined to purchase the service of a stripper for this purpose, I would have picked a better looking one.
Laws DO legislate morality, as they should.