To: eastforker
Exactly.
I thought it was the new mantra that what one does in the privacy of one's home is constitutionally guaranteed private no matter what.
Right?
10 posted on
05/28/2005 12:54:02 PM PDT by
Publius6961
(The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen, ignorance and stupidity.)
To: Publius6961
No, I asked what statute the mom violated.Exposure to nudity in of itself I don't see as a crime, if it was minors would not be allowed in art museums.
12 posted on
05/28/2005 1:01:31 PM PDT by
eastforker
(Under Cover FReeper going dark(too much 24))
To: Publius6961
I thought it was the new mantra that what one does in the privacy of one's home is constitutionally guaranteed private no matter what. That's generally applied in the context of "consenting adults", which is not the case here.
17 posted on
05/28/2005 1:14:21 PM PDT by
ThinkDifferent
(These pretzels are making me thirsty)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson