Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MJM59

Yeah, I'm sorry...this war on terrorist murderers just does that to me. I bet you'd prefer we just apologize and free Saddam.

Perhaps you could offer an alternative plan to defanging the same threat Clinton and Kerry supposed Saddam to be? How about providing him with a way to build nuclear reactors for peaceful fuel usage? LOL

BTW, after I'm done boycotting this film, I will be reporting to bootcamp in August at the ripe old age of 39. How's that for getting a grip? I'm ready to go to Iraq, Afghanistan, N. Korea, or Iran...if my country needs me.


93 posted on 05/16/2005 8:41:07 AM PDT by Jon Alvarez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: Jon Alvarez

I don't agree with your stance on boycotts but good luck out there. Stay safe.


104 posted on 05/16/2005 9:30:31 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

To: Jon Alvarez

This war is not against terrorist murderers. At least not the ones who committed 911. They were Saudis, not Iraqis. And their mastermind is still on the loose.

As far as ridding the world of Saddam. Great, he is gone. Now we have Zarqawi. Not much of an improvement, especially in light of the growing need for body bags in Iraq. Not just for American soldiers, but for an increasing amount of civilian casualties as a result of the insurgency. I suppose that they are just part of the cost of freedom.

Saddam Hussein was not threat to this country. He had no WMDs nor a program to put them into place. Iraq was not actively involved in terrorist activities against this country at the time, nor had they been in years. Did you really go to sleep at night worrying about Iraq?

Iran on the other hand has been involved actively in terrorist activities and is in the process of developing a nuclear program. They may or may not be planning on developing weapons from this program. But they are a hell of a lot closer to a weapon than Iraq ever was.

Consider then, North Korea who many say has a much more developed nuclear weapon program than either Iran or Iraq. And they have the missles to deploy them.
Why was Iraq more of a threat than either of these two countries who are much more capable of becoming a threat to this country?

So, why are we fighting this war in Iraq again? Are we fighting for Iraqi freedom since the whole WMD thing did not pan out? Is that what it is about now? Is this the cause that we can now use to justify 1600+ American deaths? I am sorry but I take war very seriously. I want to be damned sure that if American blood is going to be spilled in some far away land that it is for a very good reason. Not to mention the hundreds of billions of dollars that we have poured into this cause.

Through BRAC we are supposed to save $50billion over 20 years. Imagine the cost savings if we had chosen to handle Iraq a bit differently. And there might be about 1600 moms that would have had a much better Mother's Day a few weeks ago.
I pray that some day, something worthwhile will spring forth from this war. Right now, I am not sure.

As far as your going to boot camp. If that is what is you want to do, good on you. I did my time in service. And if this country were truly in need of my service, I would serve again. I just choose to wait until such time as there is a real threat to our freedom. Iraq is not that threat.


108 posted on 05/16/2005 9:46:16 AM PDT by MJM59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson