Believe it or not, I work with people who, upon seeing this, will still NOT SEE THE FOREST FOR THE TREES.
1 posted on
05/11/2005 8:02:18 PM PDT by
TheRobb7
To: TheRobb7
I thought PBS was "objective".You don't think well, do you???
2 posted on
05/11/2005 8:07:34 PM PDT by
Onelifetogive
(* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
To: TheRobb7
Believe it or not we actually have the votes to turn off the spigot of funding to this left-wing propaganda machine. The question is, does the majority in Congress have the backbone to do it?
To: TheRobb7
PBS needs to drink bleach. Sell it to Al Gore.
4 posted on
05/11/2005 8:11:23 PM PDT by
Jaysun
(No matter how hot she is, some man, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t)
To: TheRobb7
The voters have really got to put some pressure on Washington to stop funding this radical propaganda machine. Let them use the free market like everyone else in broadcasting.
It's hard to believe tax payers are actually forced by their own government to pay for this crap!!
To: TheRobb7
It lists Bill Moyers of PBS as one of the speakers. I thought PBS was "objective". Bill Moyers is a whacked out sycophantic, panting, drooling groupie, butt-kissing each any and every marxist nutcase and tyrant to come into his scent range. He makes the rest of PBS look objective by comparison. Maybe that's their point- they want to stake someone out so far over the left that they look like they're in the center. People won't buy it though.
To: TheRobb7
It lists Bill Moyers of PBS as one of the speakers. I thought PBS was "objective". Bill Moyers is a whacked out sycophantic, panting, drooling groupie, butt-kissing each any and every marxist nutcase and tyrant to come into his scent range. He makes the rest of PBS look objective by comparison. Maybe that's their point- they want to stake someone out so far over the left that they look like they're in the center.
People won't buy it though.
To: TheRobb7
I thought PBS was "objective".No, no, no... They're not "objective." PBS HAS an objective. Big difference! Sort of like the Harvey Keitel quote from Pulp Fiction. "Just because you are a character, doesn't mean you have character!"
Mark
9 posted on
05/11/2005 8:35:37 PM PDT by
MarkL
(I've got a fever, and the only prescription is MORE COWBELL!!!)
To: TheRobb7
What do you expect?
The last thing one can expect a biased person to see is their own bias; that's what makes them biased. It doesn't matter whether they are biased right or biased left; it is just bias.
What is disturbing is this insistence by the media that we must be biased either to the left or the right -- and if you're biased to the left, it's not bias. These are not deep thinkers.
The real solution is not more partisanship or even more bi-partisanship but people who fairly see the whole picture. In the media bias, such a thing is not possible.
11 posted on
05/11/2005 9:13:11 PM PDT by
MikeHu
To: TheRobb7
Liberals are blinded by their own hypocrisy.
They actually think they are objective and fair and balanced.
That just shows how deep their mental dysfunction is.
13 posted on
05/11/2005 10:16:38 PM PDT by
Bullish
To: TheRobb7; Sidebar Moderator
Your link has nothing whatsoever to do with PBS. It goes to a "Take Back America Conference" page.
To: TheRobb7
do you have a direct link?
To: TheRobb7
"...progressive majority must be heard..."
Progressive=communist/socialist
I never knew the USA has a communist majority. I didn't know PBS made it their objective to push the communist agenda.
Need we hear any more proof that the CPB, NPR, and PBS should be privatized? Let them fight it out in the open market where "the majority" will decide whether to view their programs and buy advertising or not.
Let's test it in the free market.
19 posted on
05/12/2005 2:01:33 PM PDT by
sully777
(If anyone asks, I'm a monger-monger.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson