"state obscenity laws may stick"
are legs now considered obscene??
I don't think there is a polite, appropriate response to yours...
You forgot the important part--where the AG said "I have better things to do."
If these people don't want giant spread legs between a couple of churches--LET THEM BUY THE PROPERTY.
Otherwise, they're just flapping gums like far too many on this board about how 'someone should do something.' When it's obvious they can but won't, so they want government to do it for them so they get something for nothing.
I say more power to the AG. It's about time SOMEONE in government said publicly, I got better things to do than waste taxpayer dollars suing somebody over what stupid $#!# they do on their own property.