If you insist that this is hair splitting, then I am inclined to conclude my contribution to our dialoge.
"Whether dementia or some other cause, both indicated and appear to agree the condition is "permanent."
That's in the documents of both parties as you have seen. Nothing to split, it's right there, both parties.
What the legal interpretation of this may be another matter, but they agreed to the wording.
That's in the documents of both parties as you have seen. Nothing to split, it's right there, both parties.
The phrase you quote, "agree the condition is permanent" is not in either document. The quote above is YOUR interpretation, which you are entitled to.
What the legal interpretation of this may be another matter
It appears that my words are not making an accurate impression in your mind. Good day.