Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Smartaleck
Whether dementia or some other cause, both indicated and appear to agree the condition is "permanent."

Negative. You are misconstruing the documents.

I sense that Boyd felt there was an urgency to her medical eval. and that the other issues could be decided (45 days out) pending the outcome of Mae's treatment.

45 days is a boilerplate duration. The only issues before the court were course of treatment (to be, and was decided by a panel of doctors); and who was to be temporary/emergency guardian. I read that "Mae's side" is going to petition the court to order Gaddy the guardian to permit them to visit Mae. It has been reported that Gaddy the guardian has ordered that "Mae's side" be denied visitation, nad have no access to doctor's observations or opinions.

2,425 posted on 04/13/2005 6:36:19 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2423 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

"Whether dementia or some other cause, both indicated and appear to agree the condition is "permanent."

"Negative. You are misconstruing the documents."

Petition for guardianship by Gaddy, fax page number 13
Petition for guardianship by Ken folks, fax page 27

Both documents...Duration of incapacity: Permanent.

That's whats stated in the documents. What does this mean?


2,428 posted on 04/13/2005 7:17:42 AM PDT by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2425 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson