Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
The language that you proposed would confound most readers. You and I know "asphxiate," "hydration," and "respiration," but quite a few people don't know the menaing of those words.

Point taken. "Hydration" could be replaced with fluids, and the results could be reworded slightly: "...result in death from starvation", "...result in death from dehydration (thirst)", "...result in death from asphyxiation (lack of oxygen)".

Even if people don't get "asphyxiation", or even "oxygen", I think they'd figure out "death".

2,393 posted on 04/12/2005 9:21:08 PM PDT by supercat ("Though her life has been sold for corrupt men's gold, she refuses to give up the ghost.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2382 | View Replies ]


To: supercat
Even if people don't get "asphyxiation", or even "oxygen", I think they'd figure out "death".

Yes. "Death" is a well understood word. Since we're talking about a living will, I think most people will quickly grasp that the subject is death. So, the document is really aimed at balancing comfort, longevity, manner and financial cost of death.

I'm against living wills. My recommendation is to have a trusted surrogate. People can fight the shifting sands of the death shysters better than pieces of paper.

2,397 posted on 04/12/2005 9:30:20 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2393 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson