ok, I see what you're referring to. I'm seeing that it only applies to that particuliar section, which she did not enter a check mark in and is not a final statement in relationship to her intent....only in relationship to that one item.
The way it is worded confused me and I don't have any (known) mental disability. It's a horrible document and seems to be designed to totally confuse anyone! I'm thinking it was prepared in haste and equally requested to be signed at the same speed. Little time to truly understand what it is actually permitting.
The language was prepared by the Georgia legislature. They took their time with it. It is intentionally deceptive. Georgia dn Florida legilators are trying to confuse their constituents into giving up life sustaining basic care.
My guess is that if a Georgia resident were to rasie a ruckus with their state rep, the ruckus would result in NO change to the model language. The media won't make an issue of it.
Caveat emptor. Our leaders are out to get us in every way imaginable.