Which references Mae's doctor's statements to her. Easily refutable if false. They have not been refuted in spite of the intense scrutiny placed upon this case.
No argument from me on the "refutable if false" part. And no argument that Mae's doctors told Gaddy that Mae was terminal. Apparantly, there is disagreement between those doctors, and the team of three doctors named on April 4. Gaddy agreed to abide by the medical conclusion of the three doctor team, which was unanimous that Mae's condition was treatable, not terminal.
They have not been refuted in spite of the intense scrutiny placed upon this case.
I agree, the assertion of demetia has not been refuted. Yet. In the present condition of Mae and the legal proceedings, a false assertion of dementia has no practical or legal effect.
Just because I've been called a idiot pagan doesn't make me one ;-)