[visualops]

The next post down (by someone else) clarifies unequivocally:

To: freespirited; Jim Robinson; Dolphy; All
Starving a living, breathing creature, to death, is cruel and inhumane. There are *no* BUTS or overriding factors about it.

Take away guardianship.
Take away stated or otherwise wishes.
Take away brain condition.
Take away doctors' evaluations and labels.
Take away hospital/hospice care received.
Take away family dynamics.
Take away politics.
Take away law, lawyering, and judges' rulings.
Take away any and all debate.

An innocent, defenseless, living, breathing human being is purposefully being starved to death. They are not pulling any true life support *plug.*

Any member of a decent society rightly considers death by starvation to be cruel and inhumane. There is simply no way around that very base, simple, naked statement.

[Killborn]

There will be elements of "facts" and facts in any debate. The same way he dismisses the poster facts is the same way another poster will dismiss his facts.

If there was clear undeniable evidence of sth and the FRPRs and JR dismisses it, then you can worry. What the poster have is not gospel truth. Quite frankly, a lot of what we have is not gospel truth. Only God knows the real and absolute truth.