[Wolfstar]

A case in point from this thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1375750/posts.

The following response #55 from someone going by Leatherneck_MT is copied verbatim. I have highlighted the thread in bold.

But at a time when emotions are running high, Mr. DeLay needs to make clear that he is not advocating violence against anyone.”

Except when Judges are handing out edicts from on high to deprive the helpless of their Lives!

THAT is acceptable violence is it Teddy?

Resistance by force is also Acceptable!

55 posted on 04/01/2005 2:54:33 PM PST by Leatherneck_MT (3-7-77 (No that's not a Date))

[Texas_Jarhead]

Re: you comment #362

I won't attempt to speak for Leatherneck_MT but he appeared to be asserting that it is ok to forcibly resist a judge's edict to "deprive the helpless of their Lives".

Am I correct in understanding that you disagree with that position? Am I also correct in perceiving that you believe his comments represent some kind of threat? Thanks in advance.

[Leatherneck_MT]

When the helpless are being deprived of their lives, you're damned right resistance by force is acceptable.

World War II may not have been as horrible as it was nor as many Jews killed as there were had that been the case in Nazi Germany.