[nopardons]

The English eugenicists were the FABIANS ( SOCIALIST ), who later were Commies; NOT Nazi sympathizers.

And neither were most Americans,who favored eugenics, pro-Nazi.

Just because Hitler picked up on eugenics, doesn't mean that everyone else with such an interest, was in any way,shape,manner, or form pro-Nazi.

And Stalin sent far more people to their deaths, than Hitler had murdered.

It's long past time for people on this forum to stop using NAZI as a pejorative, when they can't refute someone else's argument, or attempting to prove that the LIBERALS here are Nazis, when that us not the case, no matter what kind of perverted revisionist history one uses.

[Askel5]

nopardons? Hi, Askel here. You probably remember me from all the Eugenics threads on which you must have been lurking, if not posting.

Please try to to take this in the spirit it's intended .... but, watching you try and teach thoughtomator a thing or two about the who, what, when, where of eugencics is like having my dog try and show me how to play the flute when he's got no opposible thumbs or lips to speak of.

[A Jovial Cad]

Here's a curious post from DUmmyland regarding this thread, FYI:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x3406395#3407610

Interesting, to say the least.

[thoughtomator]

Just because Hitler picked up on eugenics, doesn't mean that everyone else with such an interest, was in any way,shape,manner, or form pro-Nazi.

He picked it up and ran with it to an extent that no one has before or since. Thus when we deal with eugenics, that experience is legitimately a top example of what could happen. The progenitors of eugenics in the USA certainly did have plenty of colleagues in pre-war Germany.