=== and your gay/anti-women men-hating rants come.
My what?
I'm sorry ... but I'm busy posting some fascinating information I've found to buttress my arguments that abortion ends up as a sex-selection device that slaughters far more women on sonogram sight than men.
It's on the awesome Material Girls thread. Are you familiar with Leslie Carbone? She's dynamite.
Forget "constitutional scholars" like Ann Coulter who manage to turn Terri's death into -- GUESS WHAT? -- yet another chance to shoot fish in a barrel by riffing on liberals.
Do you think she's signed some sort of gag-rule where she's no longer able to write a serious-minded article on the subject of constitutional rights, due process or federalism v. states-rights? I begin to wonder.
In any case, I'm delighted to find Carbone's got a TASTEFUL website of her own. Particularly after Fox News's utterly bizarre faux pas regarding the Pope's death, Carbone promises to be a refreshing change from the dog-collar blonds of Fox News, mini-skirted vamps posing on national monuments or coquettish "Glamour Shots" who think to impress us with their brain power even as they coyly glance backwards at us over bare shoulders.
We need someone who can carry Phyllis Schlafly's standard ... not just pay her lip service.
Women lost most, if not all, of their moral authority when they won the vote. It appears there still are a few Good Gals out there. Carbone is one.
=== on sonogram sight than men.
You are never going to believe this ... I found articles from a Harvard database, looks like, that says they can select for sex by the FOURTH or EIGHTH CELL!!!
Is that not fascinating? I mean, when we live in a world where lesbians can purposefully select deaf girls to better match their two deaf Mommies, I should have known!
But maybe I've just been a little confused somehow by all the "Scientific" pro-aborts who discount personhood (for the first trimester, certainly) because, brain waves aside, the sex organs aren't even developed yet.
Appearances ... appearances.
All been a Big Lie, it seems. I'm sure the Scientific sorts were hip to the truth the whole time as opposed to lunkheads like me who argue the case on principle and Enduring Truth as opposed to minutia, abstract concepts and feelings.