Skip to comments.
Jeb Bush: I'd love to help, but I can't
WorldNetDaily ^
| March 27, 2005
| WorldNetDaily.com
Posted on 03/28/2005 8:02:29 AM PST by FR_addict
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 401-402 next last
To: MamaTexan
Another real conservative.
Kudos to you for defending the innocent!!!
221
posted on
03/28/2005 10:48:36 AM PST
by
PeterFinn
("Tolerance" means WE have to tolerate THEM. They can hate us all they want.)
To: Vicomte13
I will not vote Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, Green, or Communist. If a true Pro-Life party emerges I will consider it - but I will be very skeptical since the Republican party is supposed to be "Pro-Life". I don't want to support another political party that just "tickles my ears".
To: Lori675
"Are you stupid.
If it was Jeb's daughter he would send in the troops."
No, but you are for your silly name calling.
We are a rule of law nation. If the Shindlers had good representation this would not be happening. To use Jeb as their scapegoat is wrong and lowers my opinion of them considering ALL that was legally done for them from George Bush, Congress and Jeb Bush. You should be ashamed of your remarks but your emotions are over ruling your thinking.
223
posted on
03/28/2005 10:50:02 AM PST
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: workerbee
For starters he signed Terri's law about two years ago. That caused the second trial. Lawyers can't sign laws.
J.Bush is not a johnny come lately to this situation.
To: workerbee
After 10 days, doesn't it seem quite obvious she is not being allowed to pass, but forced to?Tell you what, put a nice big steak in front of her and let her eat all she wants. Sheesh
225
posted on
03/28/2005 10:51:06 AM PST
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
To: badbass
"Is that not grounds for divorce in Florida?"
Yes if htat's what both parties want.
I think you ought to blame the Shindlers for not seeking it earlier. The Shindlers screwed up.
226
posted on
03/28/2005 10:51:19 AM PST
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: 68 grunt
You have not done the necessary homework to assert the foolish comments regarding what's happening 'upstairs'. Have you seen the videos? Have you bothered to read sworn affidavits? I didn't think so ... just keep trying to play agitprop, but we all see through your false assertions because we've done the homework to decide what's going on. I pity folks like you, more than willing to dehumanize any class of people you don't want to allow the LIFE imprimatur to rest upon.
227
posted on
03/28/2005 10:51:43 AM PST
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
To: FR_addict
Com'n Jeb, don't be a G.W., a Gutless Wonder. I'm not attacking the President here, but back in the 1980's when I was in high school and college, the term "G.W." meant Gutless Wonder. Still, I like to see the President do more but the main shoulders this rests on is the governor of Florida.
228
posted on
03/28/2005 10:53:02 AM PST
by
Nowhere Man
(I hope you enjoyed your dinner, Terri Schiavo can't. B-()
To: sitetest
Another bogus analogy alert!!!
229
posted on
03/28/2005 10:53:09 AM PST
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
To: Mad Mammoth
Governor Reagan in California, and later, President Reagan, would have rejected that whining 'oh I've done all I can do' crapola, the Gipper would have had State National Guard troops and/or federal marshalls rescuing Terri Schiavo and would have had his Attorney General place that scumbag Greer under arrest for leading an insurrection. Ronald Reagan actually BELIEVED in upholding the Constitution
I believe that he would have called out the troops also.
230
posted on
03/28/2005 10:53:19 AM PST
by
pollywog
(Psalm 121;1 I Lift my eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help.)
To: Texas Deb
No disrespect, but you make my point for me. Someone must tell the Judges you go this far and no further. Let them bang their gavels all they want. Court Orders are useless unless they are capable of being enforced. As Stalin once said of the Pope when he was chastised "How many divisions does he have?".
I agree on the dynasty thing but it is a moot point now. The Judiciary must be faced up to and Jeb has proven he is not the man to do it.
231
posted on
03/28/2005 10:54:12 AM PST
by
MattinNJ
(Stop voter fraud-enact voter ID cards with photos w/ magnetic stripes that prevent multiple voting)
To: pollywog
232
posted on
03/28/2005 10:55:29 AM PST
by
Diogenesis
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: 68 grunt
Dear 68 grunt,
"Another bogus analogy alert!!!"
Such a stunning argument, so filled with facts and their logical exposition.
sitetest
233
posted on
03/28/2005 10:56:01 AM PST
by
sitetest
(If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
To: nmh
I think you ought to blame the Shindlers for not seeking it earlier. The Shindlers screwed up.That may be so, and it doesn't matter who I blame. Their daughter shouldn't have to pay with her life. If I'm reading Florida law correctly, Michael Schiavo should have been picked up on an adultery charge, without any input from the Schindlers. The law is the law, as everybody seems to be saying. I say the law is whatever your local Mandarin decides to say it is.
234
posted on
03/28/2005 10:56:35 AM PST
by
badbass
To: badbass
Oh I'm sure you're absolutely right.... But, it probably doesn't matter unfortunately, she didn't...
To: MHGinTN
... sworn affidavits? ...Lies told by zealots, too late, too bizarre, too contrived and too emotional. The Schindlers would say or do anything to circumnavigate the law for their own selfishness.
236
posted on
03/28/2005 10:57:16 AM PST
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
To: nmh
The positive action would be to have laws speak up for those that can't when there is doubt. In this situation there is doubt. Exactly. When this issue of doubt was not cleared by the judge who caused it, the Governor SHOULD step in to see that it IS corrected.
Unfortunately, he's chosen the "I caint do nothin' bout it, cause they told me I couldn't" route.
237
posted on
03/28/2005 10:57:19 AM PST
by
MamaTexan
(I am NOT a *legal entity*, nor am I a 'person' as defined by law!)
To: 68 grunt
My cousin has cerebral palsy and is severly mentally retarded. If you put a big fat steak in front of him, he couldn't eat it either. Is your conclusion that he should be starved, on the basis that he needs someone to help him eat?
To: sitetest
Well, smartguy, explain the analogy?
On one hand we have the criminal excesses of a totalitarian's war and on the other we have a finding of the rule of law. You don't like the finding, so what? Find your mountaintop.
239
posted on
03/28/2005 11:00:05 AM PST
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
To: workerbee
Can he chew? Can he swallow? Bogus analogy.
240
posted on
03/28/2005 11:01:15 AM PST
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 401-402 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson