Replies

churchillbuff's posting history:
Early posts:

Criticizes Racicot for not working to build a Senate majority.
Criticized W for not pushing for tax cuts.

Later posts (from 2005 alone!):

Nonstop Iraq War criticism:
The obligatory Armstrong Williams screed
Defended Scott Ritter. (1/28/05)
Posted a draft hoax article from Rolling Stone (1/29/05)
Criticized Mel Martinez for speaking in Spanish.
Preferred having Saddam in power.
Makes the Rich Gannon scandal a White House scandal
Continued a fatwa against Charles Krathammer on totally unrelated threads.
Suggested Rush had a conflict of interest in the Schiavo case (via the ACLU, no less).
Defended McCain and criticized Bush over the rumor that Bush was not considering private accounts.
Criticized Condi Rice for Iraq. (post-elections)
Criticized "neocons" for not supporting Terri (included Kondracke who changed his mind on the issue).

And most of the posts have altered titles. It seems that churchillbuff cannot post without parenthetical comments in the title. Churchillbuff has been trolling since the beginning. And has been conducting an often one-sided flamewar against Peach in the meantime.

Criticizing is one thing, but there is no problem, nowhere that churchillbuff cannot find a Republican to blame it on. This is troll behavior and the inflammatory altered titles of often vanity posts give it away.