Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schindlers accuse Jeb of torture
Fox News Shawn Hannity | 25 March 2005 | James F. Rowland

Posted on 03/25/2005 6:27:16 PM PST by steampower

The parents of Terri Schiavo/Schindler just made an impassioned appeal to Florida Governor Jeb Bush to save their dying daughter. Mrs. Schiavo was obviously tired and spoke in a restrained manner, but her husband, Robert, although looking terribly fatigued, used very strong language and placed much of the blame for his daughter's seven days of "torture" directly on Jeb Bush, blaming him for the inaction that is letting Terri be murdered by a "tyrannical" judiciary.

Mr.Schindler says that the Governor has the power to end their ordeal with a "stroke of the pen" and if he had courage he would do it.


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: bowtothejudges; bush; chrismatthewslies; cultureofdeath; fanatics; govbush; judicialtyranny; kooks; libel; noaihuevos; pontiuspilate; schaivo; schaivocase; schiavo; schindlerfamily; slander; terri; terrijebschindlers; terrischaivo; terrischiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 441-458 next last
To: lastchance
http://www.miami.edu/ethics2/schiavo/Filed_07-19-2004_ReliefFromJudgment.pdf

"...such judgment and order violate the Ward's free exercise of her religious beliefs, her right to enjoy and defend her own life, and, in fact,imperil her immortal soul"
241 posted on 03/25/2005 9:27:20 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: SeaBiscuit
This horrible situation should bind us even stronger to continue the fight to defeat;

I respectfully submit that we could be bound together stronger if one side of this discussion would quit calling the other side death lovers, morally bankrupt, evil, Nazis, and every other nasty pejorative you can think of.

242 posted on 03/25/2005 9:29:47 PM PST by Jotmo ("Voon", said the mattress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: mandatum

First of all, Chad, I never claimed it wasn't a constitutional republic. My only claim is that there is a higher law than mans'. Even the founding fathers believed such. In fact, for the first 70 or so years of the republic, courts were cognizant of the natural law. Only since the 20th century as all memory of its existence been erased from judicial mind. Sorry to say, but natural law jurisprudence and thought is not an exclusively Catholic idea. The common law, upon which our nations laws are based, took the natural law into account as well. The constitutional republic that you are crowing about is in fact built upon the natural law or higher law. On whose authority did the founding fathers find the gumption to break the law of their sovereign, the King of England. Natural law. The founding fathers broke the law of England because they believed there was a higher law than mans' law.

Come on back when you have done a little more schooling, Chad.


243 posted on 03/25/2005 9:34:15 PM PST by mandatum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: All
And even just one more thing. At this point, I think I'd like to go on record and state that the sarcasm, back and forth childishness, pettiness and "how old are yous?," back-biting, gotchas, over-the-topisms, and over-the-line-ism gross generalizations and intended mischaracterizations of Freeper to Freeper, is RUNAWAY. And ugly. On BOTH sides. And I certainly don't mean everyone.

If anyone doesn't see it, you're not being honest with yourself.

Flame me, I'm fire retardant.

244 posted on 03/25/2005 9:34:58 PM PST by Miss Behave (Man who fart in church sit in own pew.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Nice get!


245 posted on 03/25/2005 9:35:12 PM PST by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one

Come on, it's late; Carolina just barely won

HUH? :-)


246 posted on 03/25/2005 9:36:38 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Billy Packer can't count.

There is no way that the Villinova player traveled.

Every replay had Packer counting a phantom 3rd step!

247 posted on 03/25/2005 9:40:19 PM PST by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one; NautiNurse

Oh, Nurse and I were just discussing that!

She didn't *think* she saw the third step; I *thought* I did.........LOL.

Packer's ACC! It made up for the other guy cheering when Villanova scored!


248 posted on 03/25/2005 9:41:59 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks

Well, as a Constitutional Republic, we are a nation of laws, not a nation of "Well, we feel that is immoral, and against ourt faith, so we don't have to obey" stuff - We have to work to fix broken laws, not just ignore them and violate them at our leisure.

Chad, do you have even the remotest idea of the history of our nation? The Founding Father's broke the laws of England in order to found this constitutional Republic. Your statement is just ahistorical.

Chad, I never claimed it wasn't a constitutional republic. My only claim is that there is a higher law than mans'. Even the founding fathers believed such. In fact, for the first 70 or so years of the republic, courts were cognizant of the natural law. Only since the 20th century as all memory of its existence been erased from judicial mind. Sorry to say, but natural law jurisprudence and thought is not an exclusively Catholic idea. The common law, upon which our nations laws are based, took the natural law into account as well. The constitutional republic that you are crowing about is in fact built upon the natural law or higher law. On whose authority did the founding fathers find the gumption to break the law of their sovereign, the King of England. Natural law. The founding fathers broke the law of England because they believed there was a higher law than mans' law.

Come on back when you have done a little more schooling, Chad.


249 posted on 03/25/2005 9:44:37 PM PST by mandatum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one; Howlin
There is no way that the Villinova player traveled.

I'm wearing my Carolina blue shirt--I didn't see the travel on either replay--and I'm not complaining!

Kind of like some of the Judge Greer calls, eh? :o)

250 posted on 03/25/2005 9:45:58 PM PST by NautiNurse ("I'd rather see someone go to work for a Republican campaign than sit on their butt."--Howard Dean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

Hey Big Guy. ;-)


251 posted on 03/25/2005 9:48:42 PM PST by Miss Behave (Man who fart in church sit in own pew.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
Kind of like some of the Judge Greer calls, eh? :o)

*tweet* Personal foul! :D

252 posted on 03/25/2005 9:55:38 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (I pray to the LORD " Let Terri go home. Jesus is waiting for her with open arms. Amen!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Thanks for the link. The language is confusing but it is not claiming that Terri will go to hell if someone kills her.
Please read further on. The brief explains that as a Catholic Terri would not make the decision to end her life because of the Church teachings condemning Euthanasia and suicide. It says that for her to advocate her own killing by the withholding of food and water would be a sin of the gravest proportions. It is not saying that Terri soul is in danger of hell if this is done to her. It is saying that Terri would not have made this choice because such a choice voluntarily made would endanger her immortal soul.
http://www.miami.edu/ethics2/schiavo/Filed_07-19-2004_ReliefFromJudgment.pdf


253 posted on 03/25/2005 9:56:41 PM PST by lastchance (Life is sacred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: mandatum

Get over yourself. You ain't saying anything new, nor anything I dont' already know.


254 posted on 03/25/2005 9:57:48 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks (Sure you can trust the government... just ask an Indian...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse; Howlin

If NC plays on Sunday like they did tonight, it'll be Wisconsin packing for St. Louis.


255 posted on 03/25/2005 10:02:20 PM PST by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one

I know.


256 posted on 03/25/2005 10:02:44 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks

No worries, I knew.

But it's not a term most would know....

:-)

Best regards!


257 posted on 03/25/2005 10:05:59 PM PST by swordfish71 (There is no storm like the PERFECT ROVIAN STORM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
Get over yourself. You ain't saying anything new, nor anything I dont' already know.

Um, it ain't evident from your post.

258 posted on 03/25/2005 10:08:03 PM PST by mandatum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one; Howlin
Carolina played mostly passive in the first half through the ACC tourney. They didn't win that one. The talent is abundant, yet there are some mumbles about the coaching.

They came out like champions at the start of the 2nd half, then the energy sputtered. Villanova played like the old, old Temple scramblers. They were good!

259 posted on 03/25/2005 10:09:26 PM PST by NautiNurse ("I'd rather see someone go to work for a Republican campaign than sit on their butt."--Howard Dean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: conservativebabe
"I went to the link and read the whole thing twice. It seems to me, that even for patients deemed to be in PVS, that they recommend in favor of hydration and nutrition."

Under item 6

"In light of these concerns, it is our considered judgment that while legitimate Catholic moral debate continues, decisions about these patients should be guided by a presumption in favor of medically assisted nutrition and hydration. A decision to discontinue such measures should be made in light of a careful assessment of the burdens and benefits of nutrition and hydration for the individual patient and his or her family and community. Such measures must not be withdrawn in order to cause death, but they may be withdrawn if they offer no reasonable hope of sustaining life or pose excessive risks or burdens. We also believe that social and health care policies should be carefully framed so that these patients are not routinely classified as "terminal" or as prime candidates for the discontinuance of even minimal means of life support."

Bump that, conservativebabe.

260 posted on 03/25/2005 10:13:08 PM PST by Miss Behave (Man who fart in church sit in own pew.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 441-458 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson