Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Little_shoe

That would take conviction, he's too worried about getting permission from the same judge that defies congress. It doesn't seem to occur to Jeb that a judge who defies congress isn't going to give him permission - nor that the Judge doesn't have the authority to tell the Executive one way or the other. Seperate but equal means precisely that. Jeb needs to defie the Judge and show the Judiciary what seperate but equal means. Of course that would take spontanious generation of nads the size of a semi-truck; so, he'll weenie out and blame the courts for his own failure.


23 posted on 03/25/2005 11:50:27 AM PST by Havoc (Reagan was right and so was McKinley. Down with free trade. Hang the traitors high)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Havoc
They are separate, but NOT equal. Separate be equal = liberal BS.

The legislative branch (Congress) has the ultimate say in this republic. They can dissolve courts, impeach the surpremes, and the president.
Next is the Executive branch, which may dissolve a court. This has happened before.
Last is the judicial, which CANNOT try the president or dissolve Congress.
This is how I understand it. If anyone can prove otherwise, PLEASE DO...
41 posted on 03/25/2005 12:03:04 PM PST by Edgerunner (Proud to be an infidel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson