Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Truth666
guess what the other candidate location to have placed the microcephaly patient's skull was...

See post 14. microcephaly, per se, has been fairly well ruled out. There might conceivably be more exotic pathological explanations, but the most obvious one is a non-starter, from almost the beginning of the investigation.

23 posted on 03/06/2005 4:27:44 PM PST by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: donh
I explained the forgery in detail.
The professors and "scientists" that you quote are part of this forgery.
What's special about this story is the fact that this brave professor refused to play the role that they expected from him (otherwise he would not have been allowed to inspect the skeleton).
24 posted on 03/06/2005 5:07:29 PM PST by Truth666 (http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Proof+that+at+least+one+of+two%22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson