Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dervish
Much of the problem with Pit Bulls come from two things in my opinion -- bad owners and the fact that these are highly powerful animals pound for pound. They are not inherently bad dogs.

 

Pitt Bulls are blemishing the reputation of all fine dogs, no matter the reason for them being outlaws.

When pit bulls fight they grip the object, dog, or child, human being and lock onto them. They have extremely powerful jaw pressure and in many cases are extremely aggressive which is confirmed by the number of people that have been killed by this breed.

There is absolutely no rational reason for 'loyalty' to this particular breed unless it is to be used for what skills and instincts which have been bred into it, dog fighting.

If you want a family dog than get a dog that expresses the good traits for such a doggy job. There are more than enough to choose from.

Why go with a breed that's designed to kill? For dog fights non-the less? The very opposite of what you actually want? If it's about insecurity of some sort, which we'll not go into here, than spend your resources on building your muscles, or brain power, or something which might actually solve your insecurities rather than creating even more problems for you.

This kind of 'loyalty' has nothing to do with the love of dogs. If you truly loved them then you would respect their natural tendency's and instincts and provide the proper environment for them. The other night on the 'dog whisper' he had a little old couple who bought a 100 pound sheep herding dog to live with them in their suburban home, I doubt if either of the couple weighed in at over 100 pounds themselves.

When this dog was very unhappy not being able to go out and run around chasing sheep all day, for which he was bred for, they acted like something was wrong with him, rather than with themselves for not getting a dog who only needed to be walked for a few minuets a day and who would not knock down their fine furnishings, which what they really wanted. This couple had bought the dog to impress their friends, as you might buy  a new fashionable pair of pointed toe shoes, rather than because they loved the dog, or even knew what the dog was.

91 posted on 02/18/2005 1:21:57 PM PST by joyhalcyon (Your conscious is the voice of God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: joyhalcyon
There is absolutely no rational reason for 'loyalty' to this particular breed unless it is to be used for what skills and instincts which have been bred into it, dog fighting.

I disagree. The same characteristics that make them flawed in your mind make them wonderful companions, playmates, and workers to others.

And how are they tarnishing other dogs since so many seem happy to say what Pits do wrong is unique to them, such as slinging, which in my opinion many (all?) dogs do.

I don't agree they are "outlaws." I simply note that the breed is often misused for "guard duty" to which they are unsuited. APBT, as I prefer to think of them (the UKC designation) have been around a long time in America. Have they always had such problems or did their problems come into being in association with the drug/gang element that was using them inappropriately for their physical strength and tenacity?

Phyical strength and tenacity are also positive attributes.

I hope you don't believe in the myth of the 'jaw lock.' They no more lock than mine does.

93 posted on 02/18/2005 2:07:07 PM PST by dervish (Europe should pay for NATO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson