[Simmy2.5]

The Deathsta...I mean Iapetus. Note Hoagland's amazing skill of draw lines on pictures to prove Aliens could be involved.

[Crazieman]

Oh for the love of...

If anyone here takes him seriously, I will travel to your house and smack you upside the head.

[RayChuang88]

I am NOT going to ask what he says about Mimas, the moon of Saturn that looks suspicious like the Death Star from the Star Wars movies.

[martin_fierro]

Makes sense to me.

[Brett66]

He's on George Noory's show talking about being NASA administrator a month or so ago. It would be fun for about a month to hear his crazy theories, but it would soon turn into a major international embarrassment. He certainly likes to promote himself and his merchandise,and that's really why he indulges in the kookery.

[Simmy2.5]

MORE GOOD NEWS! Richard C. Hoagland WILL be on tomorrow's (well, I guess now, technically tonights since it is past midnight) Coast to Coast talking about...YOU GUESSED IT, Iapetus! Let's all bow down to the genius of Richard C. Hoagland on George Noory!

[RightWhale]

Hmm, very suspicious.

[Mr. K]

Is there a ping list for this space stuff (including kooky Hoagland) I love this stuff!

[victor was right]

if richard hoagland were a moon he'd be covered with craters.

i have never been one of the hoagland hecklers, but i've really been disappointed since that CYDONIA CITY fiasco two years back. when the subject of his credibility came up, i would mumble something about "stay tuned" and try not to defend him anymore, and just let richard worry about richard. WELL.....

i am more than half convinced he is correct about iapetus.

first, let me say it is a lot of work to read a 3-part, somewhat technical article, so my conclusions are tentative here. that said, what i have absorbed so far has me VERY excited. flabbergasted might be a better word.

what is so terrible about a 900 mile wide artificial satellite in our solar system anyway? IF it's genuine it's been there since the dawn of human history and nothing bad has happened because it.

i think this thing deserves a lor of debate and discussion. A LOT. keep in mind however that giving richard H. a beatdown is not "debate and discussion"......some of you seem to compulsively attack his motives and mental health without giving his latest truth claims a half-decent read.

so far, FOR ME, the most impressive evidence is the radar signal deflection. the radar behaved exactly as it would if this thing were artificial [NOT a sphere]. also, the fact that the notoriously data-shy JPL is still refusing to release the radar data sets is not helping quash the growing murmurs that this thing is an ET artifact.

IS IT just a big dumb moon, with an obsessed human named richard hoagland adopting it as the latest prop in his delusional fantasies? that 12 mile high "wall" is telling me it isn't.