Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: speed_addiction
I especially loved Turtledoves "Guns of the South."

I first stumbled across "Guns Of The South" when it was being read on the NPR show "Radio Reader." I had stopped the car and my family had gotten out to go get McDonalds and I sat there listening. They were well into the book and describing a particular Civil War battle that I recognized, the Battle Of the Wilderness. I was impressed with the accurate description that allowed me to recognize it without the author actually saying "this is the battle of the wilderness." I had no idea that this was an alternate history novel, let alone SF.

The action was taking place near the crossroads and the rebel forces were running out of ammunition. Yep, that happened. And finally the ammunition wagons pulled up, but the first few crates had the wrong ammunition, all mini-balls. O.K., I thought the rebels were still using mini-balls at this stage and that was one of the reasons they lost the battle, but I'd go along. Oh, they found another case with the right ammunition... the banana clips...

BANANA CLIP??????????

.... for their AK-47s.....

AK-47S!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That's the point I knew I had to buy the book and find out what this was all about. The thing that so impressed me also impressed Shelby Foote, the great Civil War historian. He thought so much of the accuracy of the manuscript (except for the things directly changed by the time travler plot element) that he wrote the forward for the book.

That "little" left turn that Turtledove used to allow the south to win was a bit too much, even for his tastes. He has revisited the idea of the south winning the war in another series of books, but with a much more subtle change, where battle plans lost by a southern general (in reality) and recovered by the north, leading to a southern defeat, are recovered instead by a southern soldier (in his story), thus altering the whole history of the war.

I got bored with the World At War books after it became apparent that book 3 wasn't going to resolve anything and haven't gone back to them yet. Someday I may.

142 posted on 02/01/2005 9:05:57 AM PST by Phsstpok ("When you don't know where you are, but you don't care, you're not lost, you're exploring.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Phsstpok
That "little" left turn that Turtledove used to allow the south to win was a bit too much, even for his tastes.

What I liked was the South winning and President Lee still deciding that slavery had to go (which almost led to another war with a faction of General Forrest). It showed that even though the time travelers tried to change history, they really didn't affect it that much (at least in the way they wanted to).

150 posted on 02/02/2005 8:50:34 AM PST by Hacksaw (You can judge a man by the members of his bump list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson