To: Texan5
"Unless the plat and original sale deed of the subdivision shows something, it appears that we are being scammed..."The rancher could have sold the water/mineral rights to someone else. That was done a lot in CA.
404 posted on
01/23/2005 9:19:38 AM PST by
Slip18
To: Slip18
The only thing sold by all the ranchers in a 25 mile long area of riverfront was floodplain to be flooded for this lake when the dam building was proposed in 1911. It was built in 1912, condemning the purchased land by flooding it with water over 200 feet in places. The water in Texas rivers, lakes and all other navigable streams belongs to all the people in Texas, according to state law. There are no minerals, oil or otherwise under that lake, or you can bet the greedy bastards at the water co would be sending divers down to drill it out.
450 posted on
01/23/2005 2:24:09 PM PST by
Texan5
(You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line...)
To: Slip18; Texan5
Oldest tale in Texas => The guy who found out he did NOT have to sell the mineral (oil) rights underground in Texas when he sold the "top" of the land to somebody else.
Now, with the Edwards Aquifer recharge zone being so, so politically correct, maybe "water rights" are going to become what oil rights were.
477 posted on
01/23/2005 5:18:41 PM PST by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson