Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RobRoy

I still prefer laserdisc for "instant accessibility" (no stupid menus to select chapters; no "Easter Egg" features), 50k+ frame image discs (for example art collections or NASA photos, as well as several hundred production still collections for a given film).

Animation transferred to CAV at true "1 frame" freeze frame capability.

Fast foward motion on a CAV disc was truly an accelerated version (forward or reverse) as every single frame was displayed, none of this "CD like" skipping ahead.

And although the resolution may have been "lesser" there is no compression artifacting. DVD has improved in this regard but some companies still fall short in their DVD production.


70 posted on 12/06/2004 12:02:34 PM PST by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: weegee

Yeah. The fast forward on LD's was much, much better than dvd. And the CLV discs (the ones that were only 1/2 hour per side) had remarkable abilities. I had a disk with something like 50,000 pictures of airplanes. Again, pre-divorce. Never did see them all...

Still, DVD is, much better for lots of practical reasons, not the least of which is size and portability.


83 posted on 12/06/2004 12:14:46 PM PST by RobRoy (Science is about "how." Christianity is about "why.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson