Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: babygene
Why is it anyone's business what substances an athlete takes?

Medical reasons aside (and there's lots of debate on that issue), the issue relates to maintaining a level playing field among the participants in the sport. Bobby Bonds might be a better home runner than Hank Aaron or Babe Ruth, but if his performance was enhanced in a manner not available to the others, would his capabilities really be superior? The rules are there for several reasons, and that's one of them.

28 posted on 12/04/2004 9:03:31 AM PST by meyer (Our greatest opponent is a candidate called Complacency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: meyer; Jokelahoma
"the issue relates to maintaining a level playing field among the participants in the sport."\

First of all, you have to realize that professional sports is just "show biz", nothing more...

Olympic athletes are so highly engineered that it also has little to do with natural ability.

Your argument is bogus.
41 posted on 12/04/2004 9:20:33 AM PST by babygene (Viable after 87 trimesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson