>Explain why making the bull madder so he'll buck harder is >not in and of itself causing pain
Having ridden bulls for three years, they don't make the bull angry. Remember, in bull riding the flanks are tied on before the gate is opened. If they made him mad, he would get a wild hair in the chute and you wouldn't be able to take your wrap properly - especially on a smaller bull that can jerk you around a lot.
>nother goofy statement that will only fool those who have >never watched the sport. Dull? No they are not. Anchoring >the feet? BS
I participate in the sport. The spurs are not sharp. You couldn't cut something with them if you tried. You are correct that spurring will get you more points, but a lot of 90+ points are made on good bulls without spurring action. The spurs do anchor your feet to the bull - they are somewhat loose on your boots and act as "shock absorbers" almost to keep your feet from being blown out when the bull turns back. You don't wear them for the purpose of agitating the bull.
At least you didn't say they just 'tickle' again. But you miss the point.
I agree that it is a free choice thing. I'm not saying outlaw it. But it is does not represent a "true" cowboy talent, which, IMO, is what the rodeo did.
I know that the flank strap is put on while the bull/horse is in the bucking shoot, but I thought it wasn't pulled tight until the door was opened. I don't believe it causes pain, but is an irritant that the animal is trying to rid itself of.
Becky
I have to say your "description" of the flank strap and spurs is not an honest evaluation. Sounds like spin to me:) If not to keep an animal bucking what is their purpose? And you don't stay on by anchoring your spurs to the animal. You are suppose to run them up and down on thier shoulders, is what I thought. If they were used as an "anchor" then they would be a pain causer.
Once again, I don't believe they actually cause pain, but they do help to keep the animal bucking.
Becky