Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: tjwmason

I was being flip and should have been clear with my wording. Dan Rather, I suspect, would NOT think that the Shroud was genuine even if he understood the underlying history or science.

Shroudie


8 posted on 09/27/2004 8:57:42 AM PDT by shroudie (http://www.shroudstory.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: shroudie
I was being flip and should have been clear with my wording. Dan Rather, I suspect, would NOT think that the Shroud was genuine even if he understood the underlying history or science.

I too was joking. I am sure that Rather would never even contemplate that the Shroud is genuine, just like the vast majority of the saecularised world.
9 posted on 09/27/2004 1:18:23 PM PDT by tjwmason (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson