To: tjwmason
I was being flip and should have been clear with my wording. Dan Rather, I suspect, would NOT think that the Shroud was genuine even if he understood the underlying history or science.
Shroudie
8 posted on
09/27/2004 8:57:42 AM PDT by
shroudie
(http://www.shroudstory.com)
To: shroudie
I was being flip and should have been clear with my wording. Dan Rather, I suspect, would NOT think that the Shroud was genuine even if he understood the underlying history or science.
I too was joking. I am sure that Rather would never even contemplate that the Shroud is genuine, just like the vast majority of the saecularised world.
9 posted on
09/27/2004 1:18:23 PM PDT by
tjwmason
(Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson