Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JenB

Well...I only saw the Nine Tailors (sorry if I wasn't clear...the only one I've seen OR read) and I thought it good both printed and filmed. I'm intrigued by the English change-ringing of churchbells. I thought it took at least two entirely unpredictable twists which left his Lordship as baffled as the reader, bringing the reader along on the voyage of discovery...which to me, makes the story superior to the Poirot stories, where the hero always seems to know certain facts not revealed to the reader, or other characters, until the last minute.


3,886 posted on 08/19/2004 3:14:58 PM PDT by ExGeeEye (It's a cookbook! Soylent Green is made out of people! Luke, I am your father!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3884 | View Replies ]


To: ExGeeEye; JenB

The one criticism I've heard of teh BBC production is that Lord Peter didn't look like he's described to be in the book. I never saw the TV series, so I'm not sure exactly HOW he was different.

He's not supposed to be a very attractive guy, and maybe that's what they changed? His charm is in his wit and personality, not his appearance.

I remember also being really disappointed when I saw the BBCs Tommy and Tuppence (Agatha Christie detectives) shows. Tommy was supposed to be a short little red-headed guy with kind of a pug nose and likewise not that great looking. Instead, they have him played by a tall well-dressed guy with dark hair. Bah!


3,891 posted on 08/19/2004 3:33:55 PM PDT by RosieCotton (He is a very shallow critic who cannot see an eternal rebel in the heart of a conservative. - GKC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3886 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson