Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Bear_in_RoseBear

Okay, I see the point of your criticisms there. I suspect part of the issue there is that Heinlein had a much keener military/technology mind than Verhooven. Also from Verhooven's movies I've gathered that politically he leans to the left, so he may have been satirizing Heinlein's take on the military rather than doing it straight. Heinlein wasn't anti-military, was he?--I haven't gotten that impression from what I've read of/on him.


7,463 posted on 05/28/2004 8:01:41 PM PDT by Fedora (Smeagol-Gollum 2004: "We can be our own VP, my Precious")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7460 | View Replies ]


To: Fedora
he may have been satirizing Heinlein's take on the military rather than doing it straight.

Most definately! But I don't think it worked well as satire, either. That may be my political leanings showing. ;)

Heinlein wasn't anti-military, was he?

Most definately not; he graduated from Annapolis, served five years, and reached the rank of Lieutenant in the Navy before having to retire due to health reasons. He remained very pro-military, all his life.

7,465 posted on 05/28/2004 8:06:55 PM PDT by Bear_in_RoseBear (Richard Biggs: 1961-2004, RIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7463 | View Replies ]

To: Fedora
No, it wasn't satire; Verhooven intentionally and with malice aforethought decided to turn the novel on its ear.

Verhooven is a pig.

7,480 posted on 05/28/2004 8:37:41 PM PDT by Rose in RoseBear (HHD[ ... if he wasn't going to tell the novel's story, he shouldn't've used the title ...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7463 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson